| |
Robert Adam spoke on
September 18th at the conference for the Institute of Historic
Building Conservation, presenting the lecture “The Venice Charter and the
End of Tradition.” Robert Adam traced the redefinition of conservation
through successive conservation charters, suggesting that many assumptions
have been gradually absorbed into our policies on the built environment. As
a result, our management of historic monuments is driven by an ethos
essentially modernist in spirit, being obsessed with historical accuracy and
making sure that any extra work on a monument is distinct form the original
remains.
Robert Adam questions if it
is right that experts should frown upon conservation methods that
reconstruct monuments to look original and supposedly “mislead” the visitor.
He identifies key buildings that the public are often unaware are largely
reconstructed, but which continually fire the imagination and allow a vivid
identification with that heritage. A strictly academic or archaeological
approach potentially robs a building or monument of its life, reducing it to
a scientific specimen. It therefore contradicts one of the key aims of the
conservator, that is to allow the visitor to appreciate the work of art and
its character which made it worthy of study in the first instance. Whilst
acknowledging the basic tenets of conservation charters, he asks us not to
accept their conclusions and methods blindly. |
|